In response to the industry representative challenging your findings, you could address the issue by explaining that the absence of massive amounts of breakdown products in the environment does not necessarily invalidate your research. You can highlight that the impact of bacterial breakdown may be localized or dependent on specific environmental conditions. Additionally, you can emphasize the importance of considering long-term effects and potential accumulative risks rather than focusing solely on immediate environmental levels.
When interrupted by a teacher regarding classroom evidence contradicting your findings, it’s important to acknowledge her observation and expertise. You can express gratitude for her input and explain that individual experiences in real-world settings may vary. However, you can also clarify that your research is based on a larger sample size and statistical analysis, which allows for general trends to emerge despite individual variations. Furthermore, you can mention that additional studies are needed to explore the development of diagnostic tests and potential applications in therapy.
In response to the graduate student’s question about nerve regeneration and restoration of full function to paraplegics, it’s crucial to manage expectations while maintaining enthusiasm. You can explain that while your discovery offers promising possibilities for repairing damaged nerve cells, complete regeneration and restoration of function is a complex process that requires further research and development. Emphasize that scientific breakthroughs take time, but advancements are continually being made towards better understanding nerve regeneration mechanisms and developing effective interventions.
内容由零声教学AI助手提供，问题来源于学员提问
