- “The author’s elucidation of the theoretical framework is convoluted and abstruse, leaving readers grappling with its intricacies.”
This sentence means that the author’s explanation of the theoretical framework is difficult to understand because it is complex and obscure, which makes readers struggle to comprehend its complexities.
- “The text is replete with arcane references that presuppose a high level of familiarity with the subject matter.”
This sentence indicates that there are numerous obscure references in the text that assume readers have an advanced understanding of the subject matter.
- “Despite being written in an erudite style, the book lacks coherence due to a lack of thematic organization.”
This sentence suggests that although the book has been written in a scholarly and knowledgeable manner, it lacks unity because it lacks a clear thematic structure.
- “The author’s polemical tone detracts from the objective analysis of the topic at hand.”
This sentence means that the writer’s aggressive or controversial tone undermines their ability to provide a neutral examination of the subject they are discussing.
- “The text is riddled with equivocations and qualifications that make it challenging to discern what position the author is advocating for.”
This sentence implies that there are many uncertainties and limitations in the writing, making it difficult to determine what point or perspective the author is trying to express.
