ZBLOG

For fresh water, we propose two spatially defined safe ESBs based on subglobal boundaries that can be aggregated to the global scale: (1) a flow alteration ESB for surface water and (2) a drawdown ESB for groundwater (Table 1). Flow alteration ...

.

For groundwater, we propose a drawdown ESB based on the maximum allowable reduction in water table depth to maintain aquifer storage and groundwater-dependent ecosystems. Groundwater is a critical freshwater resource, providing drinking water for billions of people and supporting agriculture62. However, over-pumping has led to widespread depletion63,64, with associated declines in ecosystem services65. Drawdown thresholds are often used locally to guide sustainable groundwater use66–68; however, there is currently no global ESB for groundwater drawdown. We propose that the global safe ESB be set at 10% of the annual renewable groundwater supply69,70 or equivalent volumetric reductions in specific yield (the ratio of stored to total volume)71 across all aquifers globally (high confidence in Extended Data Table 1). This threshold balances the need for human access to groundwater with maintaining healthy aquifers and groundwater-dependent ecosystems72–74. The global ESB is that 100% of land area meets this subglobal boundary by limiting volumetric reduction in groundwater resources by 10% compared with natural replenishment rates (Supplementary Methods). Meeting the global ESB sums to a global drawdown budget of 283 km3 per year (Supplementary Methods). Globally aggregated groundwater drawdown is currently less than this figure; however, we are outside the global ESB because only 39% of land area meets the subglobal safe ESB (Table 1), highlighting the challenge of sustainable management of this important freshwater resource.

本站部分文章来源于网络,版权归原作者所有,如有侵权请联系站长删除。
转载请注明出处:http://sdn.0voice.com/?id=874

分享:
扫描分享到社交APP
上一篇
下一篇
发表列表
游客 游客
此处应有掌声~
评论列表

还没有评论,快来说点什么吧~

联系我们

在线咨询: 点击这里给我发消息

微信号:3007537140

上班时间: 10:30-22:30

关注我们
x

注册

已经有帐号?